Monday, 4 June 2012

Tezz: Film Review



Producer: Ratan Jain
Director: Priyadarshan
Starring: Anil Kapoor, Ajay Devgan, Kangna Ranaut, Zayed Khan, Boman Irani, Mohanlal (Cameo), Sameera Reddy
Music: Sajid-Wajid
Lyrics: Jalees Sherwani, Shabbir Ahmed
Genre: Thriller
Recommended Audience: General
Film Released on: 27 April 2012


Trailer:


Review:


When Priyadarshan’s Aakrosh came out in theatres, I was damn impressed with his execution of the almost watertight script – and the length didn’t even matter. It was another story altogether that I had decided voluntarily not to review the film at all, because my euphoria was dampened by the immediate discovery of the film being a brazen rip-off Mississippi Burning – and in fact, after watching the film, my spirits dampened even more. Now, almost two years later, when his Tezz was about to release and all its promos were out there, I had almost predicted the film to have a strange connection with The Taking of Pelham One Two Three – and I’m not talking the Tony Scott remake, I’m talking the original 70s thriller book and its immediate movie adaptation – along with some other weird revenge elements to make a concoction that seems to be one people are going to be wary enough to taste. But leaving the box-office predictions aside, I decided to take the risk and taste the concoction.
When a person returns four years later after being wronged, you know it’s revenge. Aakash Rana (Ajay Devgn) returns to London after being deported, and teams up with his ex-employees Aadil and Megha (Zayed Khan and Sameera Reddy respectively) to plan something big. Of course, there’s the mix of Aakash’s important flashback with his wife (Kangna Ranaut) and some other stuff thrown into the mix. So back to the story – Aakash plans something big – a bomb blast in a train headed for Glasgow. So the train operator has his daughter in the train, a policeman (Mohanlal) has a fugitive he’s transporting over the train, and there’s also five hundred other passengers in the train too! With time being the only option, will retired officer Arjun Khanna (Anil Kapoor) be able to succeed in his last job and provide justice? Or is his idea of justice too narrow and one-sided?
For a movie like Tezz, which obviously has a lot of mixed pre-release reactions, it was obvious that the movie had to have something different as its USP than just being an action thriller with the chops on par with Hollywood. And if that was the only factor to have made any film a success, Blue should have been a blockbuster, breaking all the records of 2009. Unfortunately, that isn’t the case with Tezz, as it rests on yet another borrowed concept (The Taking of Pelham One Two Three), mixed with your average Bollywood drama that really doesn’t matter or make us connect to the character at all for that matter. What actually changes the pace altogether is obviously Robin Bhatt’s feverishly paced screenplay, with some really well penned dialogues that make each and every scene and conversation one to watch out for. Obviously there are roadblocks like the item song “Laila” (are you kidding me?) and some odd flashbacks which weren’t needed, but more about that later.
Priyadarshan proves yet again that he has a strong hold over his medium, and even though his movies have not had that impact of late, it’s evident he knows what he’s doing, as in almost each and every scene, he adds some power and impact. Like there are some nuances that he’s improved, and there’s a lot of other stuff that looks like the story’s heading for convenience at first, but once you reach the subplot’s culmination, you know that the director had handled the “fake scare” scene really well. Adding to the fact that the audience is left with no time to either breathe or think, he’s got half his job done.
Interestingly enough, the movie shines of technical brilliance througout. Let’s start with Tirru S’ cinematography. Right from the first shot to the well shot action sequences in collaboration with the camera operators, the guy has done really well, and it’s evident no compromises have been made as regards the action sequences, be it Reddy’s bike chase, or Ajay Devgn’s fight with Anil Kapoor in the sewer (brilliant framing yet again, combined with some amazing slo-mo in the post-production stages), or even the climactic Bourne-esque fight between the two, everyone stand gripped.

The editing by T. S. Suresh complements the screenplay really well, and at times moves at such a feverish pace that there’s absolutely no time to breathe. Background score by Sandeep Chowta is an efficient addition and enhances each scene really well. The music by Sajid and Wajid is strictly functional and adds no sheen to the screen at all, except for “Main Hoon Shab”, which makes some sense. “Laila” just doesn’t need to be in the film at all. “Tere Bina” is a drag and one wonders whether the whole movie had any need for songs in the film at all.
Performances have complemented his direction really well. Ajay Devgn is a fine performer, and I’ve told this to a lot of people, time and again, that even though his expressions might not have a lot of variety, he has a certain unique versatility about him. Here he does nothing new, as he’s been part of a lot of revenge dramas before this – and way early in his career – but here he continues to lend his own touch and make Aakash Rana different. Anil Kapoor is super-efficient and handles his role with a certain dignity, without letting anything go over the top. Plus, it’s nice to notice him team up with Priyadarshan for yet another no-nonsense film after Viraasat. Boman Irani is mind-blowing. The way he handles his character arc, what with all his passive aggression and fear, needs to be lauded, and though he’s noticed a lot in his over-the-top antics in his comedies, I guess I’ll continue to like him in the roles he gives a different spin to, and this is one of them. Zayed Khan is great. Sameera Reddy is underrated. It’s a shame she’s not getting better roles in cinema with the kind of scope and potential she has. She can pull off a bike stunt as well as she can pull off a happy scene. Kangna Ranaut has a short role, which would largely go unnoticed and make people wonder why she was promoted so much in the movie, but her face-off with Anil Kapoor in the movie’s culmination will make the audience sit up and notice. Mohanlal is unfortunately underutilized, but the scenes he appears in are amazing.
Now to what didn’t work – and this is really important, because Tezz otherwise had potential to be much more than what it’s turned out to be. While Bhatt’s screenplay is terrific and doesn’t let the viewers catch a break, the story on the flipside is a weird concoction of The Taking of Pelham one Two Three (1974)Speed, the Die Hard franchise, some other train movies made in the rest of the world, and Bollywood revenge.
Also, while most of the scenes hold a lot of meat and the dialogues are firebrand, there’s some scenes which are terribly tacky and dated what you wonder why was it even needed. Avika Gor’s track was just there for the sake of being there, and despite the fact that you see a lot of potential in where it can go, she just disappears midway into the film. The same goes for Mohanlal, who has nothing to do in practically three-fourths of the film. And why in the name of God did the makers have to add “Laila” right at the start of the film? Just when the pace had gone to an all time high in the first five minutes, the speed crashed down to a zero with the very forced item number in which even Sherawat looks disinterested. The same happens with the rest of the songs that appear like annoying speed-breakers.
Overall, if you’re looking for something to pass your time, with some good masala and watertight action, this is the movie to watch, but unfortunately, for a movie with a concept as confused as this, the standard just doesn’t seem to match up, and for that matter, I’d enjoy watching Agent Vinod more, probably because as a filmmaker, Raghavan had given the otherwise wannabe movie a touch of his own.

MTV Movie Awards: Jennifer Aniston Accepts On-Screen Dirtbag Award


The "Horrible Bosses" star gave a special shout-out to her show "Friends" for unleashing her "inner sweetheart."
 Jennifer Aniston has probably never received an award like the one she got on Sunday night at the MTV Movie Awards: Best On-Screen Dirtbag.


The actress, who won for her role as dentist Julia Harris in Horrible Bosses,beat out her co-star Colin Farrell, Bryce Dallas Howard (The Help), Jon Hamm(Bridesmaids) and Oliver Cooper(Project X) for the honor.



Best On-Screen Dirtbag was the first award of the night at the annual MTV event held at Universal City’s Gibson Amphitheatre on June 3. Mila Kunis and Mark Wahlberg announced the nominees for the category before calling up Aniston as the winner.
“Do you know how long I have tried to have somebody let me unleash my onscreen dirtbag?" the actress told the audience. "A long time, and thank god this category just popped up.”
However, even as the newly-crowned On-Screen Dirtbag queen, Aniston was sure to honor her nice-girl past.
"I would like to say thank you to the television show Friends for letting me unleash my inner-sweetheart,” she said. “And here's to [Horrible Bosses director] Seth Gordon for letting me be a dirtbag.”
As for the rest of the awards of the night, The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1 took home the top honor of best movie, while Hunger Games stars Jennifer Lawrence andJosh Hutcherson won for best female and male performances.

Foreign Box Office: 'Men in Black 3' Stays No. 1 Overseas With $275 Million-Plus


"Snow White and the Huntsman" places second while Ridley Scott's "Prometheus" debuts No. 3 in 15 markets.


Taking the No. 1 box office spot overseas for the second consecutive weekend, Sony’s Men In Black III bagged $79.1 million on the foreign theatrical circuit – down a mild-mannered 38.9% from its opening offshore round – from 19,992 venues in 90 markets, lifting its foreign gross total to $275.4 million.



Finishing No. 1 in 20 territories, director Barry Sonnenfeld’s special effects extravaganza in 3D costarring Will Smith, Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin showed real staying power across many key markets, with China down just 29% with a $15.5-million take from 5,207 locations.
In Germany, the drop was a mere 2% ($5.3 million from 987 venues) while the U.K. tally actually increased by 2% to $4.9 million from 913 sites. In Russia and China, MIB3 has rolled up a total combined gross of $81.8 million. 
Opening No. 2 overseas overall was Universal’s Snow White and the Huntsman, which collected $39.3 million at 4,487 venues in 45 territories.
Director Rupert Sanders’ period action fantasy costarringKristen Stewart, Chris Hemsworth and Charlize Theron(also the costar of Prometheus) premiered first in 30 markets with the U.K. the best (ranking third with $5.5 million drawn from 476). Bucking the European sports calendar, Snow White debuts this week in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Bulgaria, Latvia and The Netherlands. 
With the European soccer championship beginning Friday (June 8) in Poland and the Ukraine, there is a certain make-it-while-you can frenzy at play this round on the foreign theatrical circuit before the nearly month-long sporting event (concluding July 1) monopolizes audiences in front of television sets.
Fox rushed the overseas opening of the weekend’s No. 3 title, Prometheus, a week before director-coproducer Ridley Scott’s horror-sci/fi title -- loosely linked to his 1979 Alien -- debuts in the U.S. and Canada. The studio figured this made sense in 15 selected markets including the Ukraine, France, the Benelux countries, Scandinavia, Russia and the U.K.
Opening round drew $35 million from 4,695 locations (3,300 spots in 3D) for a per-venue average of $7,461. Prometheus ranked No. 1 in 14 of its opening territories with Russia drawing $11.1 million from 1,670 situations.
Three biggest European territories were the U.K. ($9.99 million at 1,019 locations, a market record for a Ridley Scott title), France ($7 million from 665 sites) and Sweden ($1.59 million at 172 spots), both of which were the second-highest market openings so far this year. Openings in Australia, South Korea and Taiwan are on tap this week. 
“We are holding back in Germany and Spain where (Euro soccer championship) TV viewership is highest and June admissions soft,” said Craig Dehmel, Fox International’s senior v.p. of sales and strategic planning. In Italy, Fox has decided not to play Prometheus “until after the summer lull, when business picks back up in the fall.”
In any case, the highly watched 16-team tournament will put a dent in June film attendance generally in Europe much like the World Cup soccer championships in South Africa did two years ago.
The Euro Cup, the biggest sporting event staged in Eastern Europe since the 1980 summer Olympics in Moscow and the 1984 Winter Games in Sarajevo, is likely to create continental distribution hassles for the Hollywood majors. 
This week, for example, Paramount is releasing DreamWorks Animation’s Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted in 28 foreign markets this week, including only five in Continental and Eastern Europe.
No. 4 on the weekend, Marvel’s The Avengers  -- which opened overseas six rounds ago and a week before its domestic bow -- has surpassed the $800-million foreign gross mark ($802.5 million) after a sixth weekend that provided $12.4 million from 53 territories. Worldwide, the super-hero mélange has drawn $1.355 billion making it distributor Disney’s highest gross film globally.
Taking in $32.4 million so far in its two top territories -- Japan ($18.7 million) and France ($13.7 million) -- Warner Bros.’ Dark Shadows has rolled up a foreign gross total of $120.5 million. DirectorTim Burton’s big-screen version starring Johnny Depp of a vintage TV soap opera took in $7.2 million on the weekend at some 4,000 screens in 52 territories. It ranks No. 5 on the weekend.
Paramount’s The Dictator has passed the $60 million gross mark overseas ($60.6 million) thanks partially to a $6.46 million weekend at 2,865 sites in 30 markets.  A No. 3 third round in Germany drew $1.4 million from 515 locations for a market cume of $8.8 million.  The Sacha Baron Cohen comedy opens this week in Israel and Hong Kong.
Taking the No. 2 spot after Men In Black III in Australia is Lionsgate’s What To Expect When You’reExpecting. The comedy starring Cameron Diaz opened (via local distributor Roadshow) at 245 spots and drew an estimated $2.3 million.  Weekend overall at multiple territories drew $3.7 million, lifting the film’s international cume to $8.7 million.   
Opening No. 9 in the U.K. was Entertainment One’s release of director Ken Loach’s The Angels' Share, which played in main competition at this year’s Cannes International Film Festival. Opener at just 73 screens for the social realist fairy tale about the unemployed young drew an estimated $800,000.
Director Wes Anderson’Moonrise Kingdom from Universal/Focus Features drew a No. 10 ranking in the U.K. with a second round tally of $330,000 from 133 playdates for a 10-day market cume of $1.1 million
Dropping about 25% in its third round in France was UGC’s release of director Jacques Audiard’s Un gout de rouille et d’os (Rust & Bone). The drama about an ex-boxer (Matthias Schoenaerts) who takes up with a trainer of killer whales (Marion Cotillard) drew an estimated $1.4 million at 460 playdates, lifting its market cume to $8.5 million. The film ranks No. 3 in France after Prometheus andMen in Black III.
Other international cumes:  Universal’s American Pie: Reunion$169.8 million (after a $2.4 million weekend at 1,600 sites in 31 markets); Hugo, $81.3 million in Paramount-handled territories including China where the market opening drew $2.67 from some 6,000 dates; Universal’s Battleship, $235 million; Fox’s The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel, $82.16 million; Universal’s Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax, $97 million; Fox’s The Descendants, $94.1 million; and Fox’s Titanic 3D, $286.5 million.

Pink Ribbons, Inc.: Film Review


Provocative and well-argued doc criticizes mainstream breast cancer charities as "pinkwashes" that do far less than they could to end the disease.


Opens: Friday, June 1 (First Run Features)
Production Company: National Film Board of Canada
Director: Léa Pool
Screenwriters: Nancy Guerin, Patricia Kearns, Léa Pool
Producer: Ravida Din
Directors of photography: Sylvaine Dufaux, Daniel Jobin, Nathalie Moliavko-Visotzky
Music: Peter Scherer
Editor: Oana Suteu Khintirian
No rating



Trailer:




Review:


Making a slew of excellent points many well-intentioned people won't want to hear, Léa Pool's Pink Ribbons, Inc. argues persuasively that much of what we're currently doing to fight breast cancer is feel-good nonsense or worse. It's easy to imagine exhibitors running scared from the doc, but auds who find it will be rewarded with a serious and provocative film.




Based on the book of the same name by Samantha King, the doc isn't what some viewers might expect: No mention is made of the controversy the Susan Komen foundation (the most prominently featured group here) has faced this year regarding Planned Parenthood, nor is the film an exposé claiming to find bureaucratic waste or fraud within a group that reportedly pays its CEO close to half a million dollars annually.
Instead the film, like its most convincing interviewees, prefers to tackle more complicated questions. It argues, counterintuitively but persuasively, that spending hundreds of millions on pursuing medical cures for cancer isn't nearly as promising as investing in prevention. It lambastes the onslaught of pink-branded consumer goods, whose purchase makes people feel they're doing something but often contributes little to the cause (while draping an ugly, hateful disease in the color of valentines and Disney princesses). Author Barbara Ehrenreich is particularly vocal on the latter point, noting (as do members of a stage-IV support group in Austin) how little comfort all that pastel iconography gave during her own experience with the disease.
More damningly, the film takes a scientific tack, noting that many of the corporations most closely associated with cancer-related charities owe much of their income to products made with carcinogens. Cosmetics companies try to look righteous while refusing to make safety studies of their wares public; auto manufacturers offer "cure"-themed cars made in factories whose workers suffer tremendous cancer rates.
Throughout, Pool juxtaposes well-reasoned, impassioned arguments from activists with images of various events and marketing pitches intended to make curing cancer seem as simple as buying the right yogurt or taking the weekend off to walk with like-minded women. Pool's footage emphasizes the cattle-like, cheerleading aspect of these events; though that effect is tempered late in the film by shots of individual marchers discussing their reasons for participating, walkers would be justified in complaining that the film portrays them as simpletons. (Or, when footage of slow-trudging demonstrators is paired with Peter Scherer's needlessly ominous score, as zombies.)
Then again, it's hard to fault Pool for not giving more credit to pink-clad crowds who are so loudly praised by Revlon, Avon, and other entities -- all crowing about the millions they've raised, but saying little about what their research has accomplished or how their own bottom lines might depend on chemicals many suspect have exacerbated cancer rates worldwide.
Bottom Line: Provocative and well-argued doc criticizes mainstream breast cancer charities as "pinkwashes" that do far less than they could to end the disease

6 Month Rule: Film Review


Writer/director Blayne Weaver stars in his own film as an irresistible womanizer; the film might have worked if he displayed the sort of devastating sex appeal that would make his character’s comeuppance satisfying.


Opened June 1 (Abramorama).
Production: Secret Identity Productions, Steakhaus Productions.
Cast: Blayne Weaver, Martin Starr, Natalie Morales, Patrick J. Adams, Vanessa Branch, Dave Foley, John Michael Higgins, Jaime Pressly.
Director/screenwriter: Blayne Weaver.
Producers: Brandon Barrera, Steak House.
Executive producer: James Ballengee.
Director of photography: Daniel Stoloff.
Editor: Abe Levy.
Production designer: Michael Fitzgerald.
Costume designers: Sarah Trost, Glenda Maddox.
Music: Andrew Hollander.
Rated R, 95 min.  




Trailer:

Review:
There should be a psychological study commissioned of filmmakers who star in their own movies as men seemingly irresistible to women, with the spectrum running everywhere from the totally believable (Ed Burns) to the not-so-much (Eric Schaeffer). The latest poster boy for this syndrome is Blayne Weaver, whose 6 Month Rule features him playing--you guessed it--a womanizing cad who’s catnip to the ladies.
The writer/director stars as Tyler, a photographer whose busy love life is conducted by a rigorous set of rules, including the one providing the film’s title specifying that there’s no woman that can’t be forgotten in six months.
Helping him stick to his non-committal ways is his friend with benefits, a model (literally, since she’s played by cover girl Vanessa Branch) who apparently does little more than wait around her apartment clad in sexy lingerie waiting for him to make an appearance.
Tyler meets his match, naturally, in the form of the beautiful Sophie (Natalie Morales), who sees through his womanizing ways and constantly shoots him down with a series of withering quips. The suddenly lovelorn cad is reduced to desperately trying to win her away from her rock star boyfriend (Patrick J. Adams), in between counseling his sad-sack best friend (Martin Starr) who’s been unceremoniously dumped by his longtime fiancée (Jaime Pressly).
While the film might have worked if Weaver displayed the sort of devastating sex appeal that would make his character’s comeuppance satisfying, viewers are more likely to be left wondering why it didn’t simply happen sooner.
The generic goings-on are somewhat alleviated by the dryly funny if unfortunately brief appearances by comic veterans Dave Foley and John Michael Higgins as minor characters who bemusedly observe the romantic machinations.
Meanwhile, Morales is so sexily appealing as the object of Tyler’s affections that she puts viewers in the atypical position of hoping that the hero doesn’t get the girl.
Bottom Line: An ineffective indie variation on the sort of generic romantic comedy that should be starring Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson.